Bayelsa:“A System in Question—Matilda Abrakasa Ayemieye Under Intense Scrutiny in Patience Jonathan Workers Case”

By Passman Akpos
Fresh controversy has erupted in Bayelsa State following serious allegations against the state’s Chief Judge, Matilda Abrakasa Ayemieye, over claims of deliberately stalling the prolonged trial of 14 domestic workers formerly employed by Patience Jonathan.
The workers, who have been in detention since 2019 over alleged theft of high-value jewellery, are now at the center of what multiple court insiders describe as a troubling pattern of delays, absenteeism, and procedural stagnation at the Bayelsa State High Court Yenagoa.
Mounting Frustration in Court
Tension reportedly peaked on Tuesday when proceedings were once again stalled due to the absence of the presiding judge—marking the third such occurrence in 2026 alone.
Court officials, speaking anonymously, expressed deep concern over what they described as a growing pattern.
“It is only the first defendant that has completed her defence. The rest have been left hanging,” one source disclosed, adding that repeated adjournments are now raising suspicion of intentional delays.
Another insider alleged that the situation may not be coincidental, hinting at a broader political undertone.
“We are hearing there is a plan to push this case beyond the 2027 elections. At this point, it no longer looks accidental,” the source claimed.
Defendants Left in Limbo
Even more troubling is the revelation that no new date has been fixed for the continuation of the trial, effectively leaving the case in indefinite suspension.
Legal observers warn that such uncertainty undermines the principle of fair hearing, especially as the case remains at the defence stage, with only one of the 14 defendants having concluded testimony.
“This is a clear case of justice delayed becoming justice denied,” a legal practitioner noted.
Human Cost of Delays
The prolonged detention has already had devastating consequences. One of the defendants, Sahabi Liman, died after his health deteriorated during incarceration. Though he was later granted bail on medical grounds, he eventually passed away in a hospital in Port Harcourt.
Family members blame his death on years of unresolved legal proceedings and poor detention conditions.
Several of the remaining defendants are also reportedly battling worsening health, with limited access to adequate medical care.
Allegations of Torture and Coerced Confessions
The case is further complicated by disturbing claims from the defendants, who allege that their confessions were obtained under torture. Some described being flogged, beaten, and forced to sign statements prepared by investigators.
They specifically accused a police officer identified as “O.C. Chris” and a security aide allegedly linked to the former First Lady of direct involvement in the abuse.
Despite the gravity of these claims, no known investigation or disciplinary action has been initiated against those accused.
Broader Concerns Over Justice System
While earlier concerns focused on legal tactics allegedly employed by defence and prosecution teams, the latest accusations have shifted scrutiny toward the judiciary itself.
Analysts say the case reflects deeper systemic issues within Nigeria’s justice system—ranging from prolonged pre-trial detention to weak accountability mechanisms.
With no clear timeline for continuation, the fate of the remaining defendants remains uncertain, fueling public outrage and raising urgent questions about the integrity of the judicial process in Nigeria.
As pressure mounts, observers say the handling of this case could become a defining test for judicial credibility ahead of the country’s next political cycle.



